Tag Archives: Christianity

General discussion of Christianity and Christian teachings.

Christians on High Horses

HHsA recent comment by the U.S. president led me to wonder:  What’s the difference between a modern ISIS terrorist and a Christian Crusader from 1000 years ago or an Inquisition interrogator from 500 years ago, from the point of view of their victims?

The answer: not much.

Now what’s the difference between those two above and a modern Christian, whose faith has spent the last 500 years ridding itself of crusades and inquisitions, whose faith has undergone massive social and cultural reformations when the Age of Enlightenment contributed to the secularization of European democracies and the founding of the secular democracy of the United States, events which liberated Christianity from being a tool of the State, a liberation that allowed Christianity to completely restructure itself from a political force at the command of kings to a growing and still-emerging body of Christ who take their inspiration from the actual teachings of Jesus – how would modern Christianity compare to the Dark Ages church that was more a political force than a spiritual one?

The difference would be something like the mother of Coptic Christian brothers who were beheaded by ISIS expressing her forgiveness for her son’s murderers and hoping for their killers’ salvation; it would be calls for prayer rather than calls for revenge in response to the persecution of Christians in many parts of the world, it would be the universal condemnation by the Christian community of hate and provocation that occasionally arises among them by those claiming to act in the name of Christ.

Christianity remains at or near the top of the worlds fastest growing religions, and it has successfully transformed itself into one of the world’s more pacifistic and also among the most generous of religions for global foreign aid.  Much has changed since the days the president was referring to. That Christianity existed in another time, another place, for an entirely different purpose and with a polar opposite reason for existence than the Christianity we know today.

So I don’t know if protesting the violent slaughter of those who will not convert to the perpetrators’ religion means that Christians are on a high horse of some kind.  I believe that everyone is protesting these acts of violence regardless of their spiritual tradition, and I believe that most reasonable people also accept the perpetrators’ own stated rationale for committing those acts.

Clearly the president is as horrified by this violence as everyone else is.  But the comment about being on a high horse about it made no sense at all to me, and I find that I cannot resist a brief response.

Follow-up: A bit more on Carl Jung’s perspective

carl-jung2In the previous post I quoted Carl Jung as follows:

The churches stand for traditional and collective convictions which in the case of many of their adherents are no longer based on their inner experience but on unreflecting belief, which is notoriously apt to disappear as soon as one begins thinking about it.  The content of belief then comes into collision with knowledge, and it often turns out that the irrationality of the former is no match for the ratiocinations of the latter.  Belief is no adequate subsitute for inner experience, and where this is absent even a strong faith which came miraculously as a gift of grace may depart equally miraculously.

At the end I concluded, hopefully after building a halfway decent case, that:

…once the relationship between you and Spirit begins to solidify and expand the initial belief, that belief is transformed into inner experience where it transcends belief to become knowledge.

One of Jung’s major themes was the power of symbolism in the human psyche.  A symbolic system provides a structure for belief.  The mind automatically tries to interprete events to see whether or how they might affect the self, and this automatic evaluation is done even when the event happens to others.  For this reason stories about events that happen to others (or even stories that are fictional) are evaluated by the mind almost as carefully as are incidents that you experience directly.

The part of the mind that does all this is the “schema”, first described in depth by Piaget and which was discussed briefly in Spirit of Consciousness part 2.

Within the schema are bedrock beliefs about oneself.   It is from these “core beliefs” that our self image is generated.  From within this structure, using Piaget’s terminology, events (or reports of events) are automatically examined to see whether we assimilate the news into our existing schema, or accomodate our schema to include events we weren’t prepared for or else had little information about.  Or we could dismiss them entirely as either untrue or else as being meaningless to us.

Something feels meaningingful if it resonates with our personal schema; events that we do not regard as having anything to do with us will be acknolwedged as being part of the reality we live in, but not things that reflect in any way upon our selves.

Stories resonate with us when the events fit into our cognitive-emotional framework, i.e. we understand them both on a cognitive level and on an emotional level, and that is true regardless of whether the stories are news accounts or works of literature and fiction.

Continue reading


Traditional Christian teaching about sin goes something like this:

Through no choice of your own you’re born into this world a sinner (“original sin” doctrine), and if you are unfortunate enough to have been born into the 99%-plus portion of humanity who lived and died over earth’s long history without converting or even hearing about Christianity, your ultimate destiny is to spend eternity burning in hell.

Very nice, eh?  We’re supposed to talk about a God of Love after that nonsense?

I covered ‘hell’ in an earlier post, here I’ll just reiterate that there is no such place.  Hell represents endless suffering without hope of relief, which is the way all spiritual traditions describe a life without God.  It is a powerful metaphor used even by Jesus himself in his parables (which were likewise metaphors and allegories), but when my fellow Christians take it as a literal, physical place they contradict and deny everything that Spirit’s incarnation onto this earth came here to teach us about God.

So regarding sin I’ll get straight to the point: evolution bred into us instincts that have been honed and perfected over millions of years.  These instincts are about self-preservation and self-advancement within the tribe.  They’re about fight or flight, food and sex.  We’re a pack species, a social species, so cooperative instincts are also built in to us.  These instincts are experienced as the twin drives to get ahead and to get along.  To find your place within the hierarchy of the group, and as with everything else in evolution, to use the skills and attributes you were born with to rise in power and influence.

These instincts know nothing of Spirit.  If there is an “original sin” it is being born into the ape family, with all the evolutionary drives and instincts we inherited as a result.  Many passages in the New Testament discuss the differences between being “born of the flesh” and being born “of the Spirit”, and from this perspective its a perfect analogy.  We’re born as apes, highly intelligent but embedded in ape instincts.  By using our species’ capacity for intelligence and conscious awareness we can establish a bond with Spirit and be born again, reborn into union with Spirit, liberating ourselves from embeddedness in animal instinct, and begin living, working, and evolving toward something much higher.

Continue reading

But What About my Dear Sweet Auntie Back Home who is still a Devout…

[complete that title sentence with some non-Christian religious tradition from anywhere in the world].  My dear sweet auntie was kind to everyone she met and she worked hard to raise a strong, loving family and regularly went to [temple/mosque/ashram/weekend voodoo goat butchering/whatever] all her life and died peacefully in her sleep after living a better life than most in this world.  God’s going to do what, exactly, with her soul?

As a Christian not associated with any denomination, and not fiscally dependent on keeping members coming in or preventing them from wandering off, I get to ask questions that are difficult or uncomfortable for lots of my compatriots.

Better yet, I get to answer them as I understand things.  My basic spiritual worldview revolves around three verses.  The first is the definition of Law given in the New Testament.  I covered this at length in the earlier post Making Sense of Love and Law but here it is again, its Matthew 22:36-40:

“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.

With that one statement Jesus reconstructed the entire Old Testament from scratch.   Continue reading

Notes from an Old Battlefield

“Spirit is indeed never at rest but always engaged in moving forward.” -G.W.F. Hegel

The Industrial Revolution brought radical changes to humanity in a short period of time, and traditional and once-dominant religious institutions were feeling the need to assert themselves.  In the mid- to late-1800s came Darwin, the “godless” Marx & Engels Communist Manifesto, the early attempts to study Psychology objectively (i.e. secularly), a united Germany and the Second Reich, and an up-and-coming engine of power and prosperity in the secular democracy of the United States, in which every backwoods preacher and every farmer with a Bible and a vision and a burning mission from God Almighty could start his own religion and preach whatever he wanted.

After over 1000 years of religious domination, suddenly organized religions that were centuries old were being jostled and bumped.  The world was changing, and it wasn’t about them anymore.  Catholicism reacted by holding the First Vatican Council which resulted in the doctrine of Papal infallibility.  Evangelical Protestantism went back to basics and the Fundamentalist movement was the result.  If the Pope wanted to claim infallibility for himself, then the Protestant response was that it is the Bible and the Bible alone that is infallible.

Infallible, inerrant, and accurate in every way.  I was raised to read the Bible in fine fundamentalist tradition: you don’t play around with the words in the Bible, they came from God.  You respect that, and if the Bible says women aren’t to be permitted to speak in church, then women aren’t supposed to be preachers.  If it says homosexuality is wrong, then you have to believe that, too.  If you see that these things were written in a particular time and place in history and reflected the values of a specific culture rather than anything actually taught by Jesus, then you keep that to yourself because its in the Bible, see?  Don’t argue!  And if it says that earth was created in six days a few thousand years ago, you don’t argue with that either.

This is how I was taught to read the Bible.  But reading it is one thing.  What if you want to understand the Bible?

Continue reading

Making Sense of Love and Law

Part of the enlightenment that Jesus brought to mankind was to center everything around love, including laws written by God the Father back in the Old Testament. The heart and soul of Hebrew Law was the ten commandments: Four about duty to God, and six about duty to each other (“Honor your parents, don’t lie, steal, covet, etc.)

Part of Jesus’ message was to change the focus, the perspective, of Old Testament law.  He did this in two ways.  The first was to get at the very essence of those ten commandments by refocusing them from something driven from the outside (Thou shalt not!) to something driven from within: Love God with all your heart, soul and mind and love your neighbor as yourself (Matthew 22:36-40).  Verse 40 emphasizes,  “On this hangs the law and the prophets.”

This is a major transformation. It parallels an individual’s years-long transformation from child to adult during which children must internalize lessons taught by their parents.  When we’re young we just have to obey: Don’t touch the stove!  Put on your seat belt!  Brush your teeth!

As we mature we understand the reasons for these things, and we’re no longer confused by the contradiction that mom or dad can cross the street but I can’t.  With more maturity, more is expected of us, but along with that comes more freedom.

So the emphasis is now on Love, but what about “Law”?  The New Testament continues to speak of it.  Paul discusses the law at length.  The commandments might have been changed to “love”, but are we legally bound to love?  The same way the ancient Hebrews were bound to follow the ten commandments and all the other 600-plus Hebrew laws?  Did Jesus just switch one set of laws that had to be followed on pain of death for a greatly simplified version that also has to be legally followed on pain of death?

How does THAT work?

Actually it does not work at all, and it never could.  Love comes from the inside, it is spontaneous and natural, and no outside force can make you genuinely feel and express an emotion like love.  Love is not experienced on demand.

So here’s us Christians saying, “Love God, or you’re going to roast in hell for eternity.”

To love under such conditions, under such a threat, is impossible.  Absolutely impossible.  The way we’re trying to bring people to Christ seems better modeled after the Stockholm Syndrome than on anything like genuine, spontaneous love.  So what’s this all about?  And could we Christians do a better job of making our case if we took a second look at it?  Continue reading

A Few Words on Forgiveness

Christianity has a lot to say about forgiveness, about forgiving each other for past wrongs, and I just want to add a few quick words about it.

Forgiveness is not done for the benefit of the forgiven.  It is done for the benefit of the forgiver.  When you forgive someone, it is a decision you make that says, “I’m not going to let this hurt me anymore.”  Every time we think of the event we experience the residual pain or anger all over again, and that’s a crappy way to go through life.

Sometimes you can’t let it go.  But we can forgive.  That brings the power and energy back to you.  You are the one who was wronged, only you have the power to forgive.  To exercise that power, to consciously be the better person in that situation, liberates.

Teilhard de Chardin: the Outcast Reformer

“The day will come when, after harnessing space, the winds, the tides, and gravitation, we shall harness for God the energies of love. And on that day, for the second time in the history of the world, we shall have discovered fire.”   -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Check out the American Teilhard Association for lots more info on Teilhard than I’ll be able to squeeze into this post.

Most of Teilhard’s writings can be downloaded for free from Archive.org.  The essay “How I Believe” is an excellent introduction to Teilhard’s thinking, and is found in a collection of short works called “Christianity and Evolution” which is available here.

The quote below is from “How I Believe”:

I believe that the universe is an evolution; I believe that evolution proceeds toward Spirit; I believe that in man, Spirit is fully realized in person; I believe that the supremely personal is the universal Christ

One of the goals of this blog is to put to rest the idea that one cannot believe in both God and evolution by explaining this worldview and its consistency with the teachings of the New Testament.

And by the way none of this has anything to do with “Intelligent Design”.  I will write a full post on that at some point, but that concept is nothing like what Teilhard envisioned and I hesitate to even bring it up.  But I know that it will come up at some point, so I’ll talk about it in another post.

The essay “How I Believe” begins by describing how Teilhard arrived at his position regarding evolution.  It may seem like two conflicting worldviews to many, but for those of us who do not believe that Genesis 1 must taken literally in order for us to believe in God and in the salvation of Jesus, there is no conflict at all.  The difference between the two views is not one of essence, but of perspective.

Continue reading

The Evolution of a Christian

I am part of a growing community of Christians who love God, who believe in the message of salvation brought to the world by Jesus, who rely on prayer and on the working power of the Holy Spirit to help us through our daily lives, yet understand that this physical universe began in the instant we call the Big Bang, that life got to its current state by way of 3.8 billion years of evolution, and that the flesh and blood bodies we inhabit during our time on this earth comprise a preternaturally intelligent species of ape.

The development of the cerebral cortex in the human brain over the 6 million years since our species’ earliest ancestors learned to walk upright gives us a level of intelligence and consciousness not possible in other animals.  Animals know; humans know that we know.  Its a self-reflective level of consciousness awareness that no other species has.  We can think about what we think about.  We remain apes, but we are now apes who can consider our actions, analyze our experience, and perceive and think beyond the instincts and behaviors bred into us by evolution.

So for many of us, when the New Testament writers refer to us as being born “of the flesh,” we understand this to mean being born with all the natural urges and instincts we inherited as members of the Ape family.  When Jesus spoke of being born again, i.e. born “of the Spirit,” we understand that as a call to use our new mental capabilities to establish a conscious connection with Spirit and transcend the evolutionary instincts of our inner ape.  It is in this context that we understand the concept of “sin”: not necessarily as a specific act, but as a state of being, specifically the state of being apes, albeit apes capable of perceiving and reaching out to Spirit.

Our ancestors recognized Spirit thousands of years before Jesus showed up.  Venus figurines, fat little stone goddesses that date back at least 35,000 years, have been found from Europe all the way to Asia and Japan.  Something was registering in the human psyche long before there was any organized religion, long before writing was invented to carry the idea beyond any local seer’s valley.

Continue reading